Case Study for Overdue Debt Collection- Agri Input Company

About

Case Study for Overdue Debt Collection- Agri Input Company

The job of every CEO is to ensure that the business doesn’t run out of money.

One of our clients in the Agri input business had a problem with overdue debtors – despite the best efforts of the sales team to collect on time and the business was suffering due to sales teams not able to focus on sales calls and business development.

The good customers paid on time, but some debtors moved into the overdue buckets.

 

35% of our clients debtors were overdue by more than 180 days, the client approached GGA for assistance to:

 

  1. Reduce the overdue debtors and collect the outstanding
  2. Identify the reasons for customers regularly delaying payments

 

To commence the assignment, GGA requested for the detailed debtors ageing and used an analytical approach to identify the delinquent and bad paying customers, GGA categorized the customers into 4 categories:

Category Description
A category  Customers buys regularly and pays on time
B category  Customers buys regularly, but pays erratically and has overdue
 across multiple ageing buckets
C category  Customer has not made a purchase in the last 3 months, but still
 owes money to our client
D category  Customers where legal cases had already been filed sec 138 etc.

 

Basis the above categorization – GGA made a collections strategy to address the overdue issue and focus on the delaying, discontinues and difficult customers.

 

The A category customers, would continue to be managed in-house by the client, while GGA would collect the overdues from the B & C category customers and Identify customers with “No Intent to Pay” Or “No ability to Pay”

 

For D category customers, GGA would drive out of court settlements.

 

1. Time Frame for conducting the assignment

GGA set up a time frame for conducting the assignment, we received assurances from the management for 2 hours per month to discuss the performance dashboard

 

Time frame to collect the old outstandings
Month Normal process follow up for collection of overdue debtors Focus
1 - 30 days Collection of data / contact details of customers / discussions with the sales team Continuous follow up by the GGA team till the overdue invoices are collected
Circulation of data to the customers / identifying the right person to  speak with
Customer visits by GGA team - telecalling and follow up     commenced
Payments start coming in. Customers looking into their records -especially for older years
2nd - 3rd month Payments momemtum builds up, Customers respond - already issued, disputes, will pay
4th month Submission of additional information to customers, continuous follow up
5th - 6th month      Customers start paying for older years, push for difficult collections, legal cases etc

 

2. Authority letter and introduction letter at the time of assignment commencement

To establish GGA credentials to meet the customers and talk to them about the outstanding and payments – GGA obtained an authority letter and an introduction letter (for the internal sales teams)

 

The format of the letters was prepared by GGA and vetted by the client’s legal team.

 

3. Nature of the customers who had overdue payments

For the Agri Input client, the customers were medium and small sized dealers and distributors. The business was seasonal in nature and not exclusively with our client.

 

The dealers and distributors were situated in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, smaller towns and regional mandis / locations. A few of them were in remote locations.

 

The invoices were large in the number, while per invoice value was low.

This resulted in a large and wide spread customer base, with high volume of invoices

 

4. Challenges at the time of commencement of the assignment

No assignment starts smoothly due to apprehensions regarding changes and new processes and GGA faced certain challenges prior to the signing of the agreement and for about 15 days post commencement of the assignment.

 

The challenge was from the sales team, as they were resisting change, as well as a third party talking / visiting their customers for collections, further they were worried about how we would be treating their customers and the feedback the customers might give about the sales process etc.

 

The resistance from the sales team disappeared, after 15 days due to GGA’s project management approach:

  • We enable the sales team to meet / surpass their sales and collections targets and KPI’s
  • GGA presents itself as an extension of the sales team – our resources our mapped to the regional clients sales teams
  • GGA complements the sales team collections activities – we do not compete with them
  • GGA keeps the relevant sales person in loop for any communication with the customer
  • In case the customer has an issue – it is first discussed with the relevant sales person
  • GGA passes back any sales queries from the customer, to the sales team

5. How did the customers view GGA as a third party – Positively OR Negatively

We are glad to say that there was no negative fallout and customers accepted GGA’s follow up processes and approach for collections

 

GGA’s team consists of multilingual telecallers and Regional Feet on Street Resources – Pan India.   The resources are all on the payroll of GGA and highly trained in customer management and collections management” – they are all B2B experts.

 

When GGA’s team meets the dealers and distributors – after prior appointment, they take care of the following communication protocols:

  • Always address them respectfully and preferably in the local dialect for an elder
  • Never bother the dealer / distributor during peak business hours OR when they are dealing with a customer
  • In case the customer get physical / abusive or rude – leave the locality immediately and without further escalation with the customer
  • Discuss the outstanding, only after establishing the bonafides and showing the authority letter

There are times when the dealers / distributor does not want to talk to us, in that case we take their permission to take the relevant sales person on a conference call, so that the bonafides can be reinforced and discussions can move ahead.

 

6. Problems identified as to why did the customers not pay on time

No one pays without multiple reminders, and the person who follows up first, gets paid on priority.

While visiting the customers for the collections activities we identified the following reasons, why customers do not pay, as per the agreed credit period

  • Follow up not done, as the customer was discontinued and not buying
  • Sales person had left the organization and the new person did not take ownership of previous overdue
  • Customer was unhappy with the product and gave the following reasons for the non-payments 
  • Sales person said to pay after material sold and credit period offered was 180 days
  • Sales person not visiting / addressing the issues OR making sales calls
  • Material received after the due date and could not be used
  • Excess material received OR material not ordered was received / material dumped, with promise to liquidate
  • Cross billing – material invoiced to him, but delivered elsewhere
  • Material of substandard quality / defective or spoilt 
  • Schemes / discounts promised but not honoured
  • In some cases of overdues more than 180 days, we found the following issues
  • Customers had absconded and the shops were closed / shuttered
  • The customer had died and no one was running the business
  • The partnership was terminated and no partner was willing to take responsibility for the payment of the past dues

7. Legal Cases

For legal cases, there were 2 types of customers

  • Existing customers on whom legal cases had already been filed – sec 138
  • Potential customers, with “No Intent to Pay” but had ongoing business operations

GGA approached the existing legal customers with an open mind, we spoke to them about their continuing potential legal liability and encouraged them for an “out of court settlement”. We did not negotiate the settlement on behalf of our client.

 

About 28% of the legal customers, agreed for a discussion on out of court settlements. For the balance customers, a tie up was done with a Pan India Law Firm that specializes in Recovery Suits – the law firm and GGA then worked together for issuing summons, NWW’s, Police Intervention etc.

  

Summary Dashboard - Legal Cases
In GGA Scope of Collections
Category Nos % Total 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 Y > 4 Y
Data given for Legal cases 141 100% 73,277,033 8,294,894 21,748,565 16,592,242 26,641,333
Amount settled - out of court and cash collected / PDC's 40 28% 12,125,283 3,187,522 4,543,311 2,212,228 2,182,222
Balance to be collected 101 83% 61,151,750 5,107,372 17,205,254 14,380,014 24,459,111
Balance not collectable (settled amount to be written off) 40 38% 27,566,502 3,200,041 7,944,211 6,311,131 10,111,119
Balance to be followed up 101 46% 33,585,248 1,907,331 9,261,043 8,068,883 14,347,992
               
Legal cases status - balance 45 24% 17,567,180 495,907 4,177,885 5,081,644 7,811,744
Alternate KYC Required - customer cannot be found 23   8,672,229 91,463 2,133,333 2,124,211 4,323,222
Customers has no knowledge of the court case 13   4,596,987 183,333 1,132,221 1,426,222 1,855,211
Customer ignores summons / NBW's etc 9   4,297,964 221,111 912,331 1,531,211 1,633,311
               
Balance - Legal cases under follow up 56 22% 16,018,068 1,411,424 5,083,158 2,987,239 6,536,248
Forecast for settlements - decision to be taken 21 12% 8,497,619 408,946 3,372,644 1,865,347 2,850,682
Customer wants court case to continue 35 10% 7,520,449 1,002,478 1,710,514 1,121,892 3,685,566

 

For customers with overdue, who had ability to pay, but no intent to pay – we identified the concerned person and the client’s legal team sent them preliminary legal warning, so that the customer was made aware of our client’s intention.

 

Some of the customers that were not taking the follow up seriously, now began to follow up to discuss payment terms.

 

On the rest of the customers – legal notice from the lawyer’s office were delivered.

 

8. End results of the assignment

The assignment was for an initial period of 6 months and thereafter overdue more than 90 days would roll over to GGA for collections:

 

GGA submits detailed performance dashboards on a monthly basis, please see the dashboard

  • Recovered 27% of the overdues within the first 6 months
  • Identified risk and cases of absconded and customer service issues – 60%
  • Under follow up and closed in the next 3 months – 8%

 

Summary Dashboard of a collections assignment - conducted over 6 months
  In Co Scope In GGA Scope of Collections
Category 0 to 180 Nos % Total 180 to 365 1 to 2 Years 2 to 3 Years 3 to 4 Y > 4 Y
Data given at the commencement of the assignment 488,009,625 540 100% 275,763,993 41,956,016 20,594,894 62,762,733 43,439,711 107,010,639
Amount collected in 6 months   289 27% 75,072,407 23,198,848 8,223,401 23,968,318 11,737,830 7,944,009
Balance to be collected 488,009,625 251 73% 200,691,586 18,757,168 12,371,493 38,794,414 31,701,881 99,066,629
                   
Risks of non payments / issued raised by customers - 165 60% 164,945,613 5,569,399 8,776,863 32,610,340 27,823,186 90,165,826
Alternate KYC Required customer absconded   70   68,364,624 101,700 900,845 9,252,899 7,466,857 50,642,324
Refuse to Pay due to issues / material dumping etc   29   25,368,135   646,231 923,494 6,253,894 17,544,516
Material Return / Damage - No outstanding   21   14,938,912 2,773,391 2,439,697 1,166,847 6,546,783 2,012,194
Schemes promised but credit not given - adjusted - 17   12,466,077 - 398,478 935,317 1,519,941 9,612,341
False Billing - Sold to third Party   10   8,803,925 567,000 1,204,451 5,155,304 117,466 1,759,705
Sales person intervention required - Material diverted - 11   16,657,808 - 1,136,245 11,152,091 2,884,274 1,485,198
Other issues - details as given   7   18,346,133 2,127,307 2,050,917 4,024,387 3,033,972 7,109,548
                   
Balance collectable 488,009,625 86 13% 35,745,973 13,187,769 3,594,630 6,184,075 3,878,695 8,900,804
Forecasts for future collections   44 8% 20,909,821 11,112,203 1,408,946 3,672,644 265,347 4,450,682
Suggested for legal cases - ability to pay but no intent to pay - 20 1% 3,421,010   311,333 848,743 537,373 1,723,561
Under detailed follow up - discussions awaited   22 4% 11,415,141 2,075,567 1,874,351 1,662,688 3,075,975 2,726,561

The reasons for risks and non-payments, were analyzed, so that future risks and non- payments could be avoided.

9. About GGA

GGA India Private Limited (GGA) is a focused “Business to Business” Account Receivables Management Service Provider. GGA concentrates exclusively on designing, developing and implementing customized B2B debtor collections solutions for its clients.

 

Founded in 2002, GGA works with B2B organizations to collect from both concurrent and legacy debtors.

 

For any information or clarification, please contact

 

Gaurav Gupta CEO Chartered Accountant

 

+ 91 98111 63422,

gg@ggaindia.com